Showing posts with label Victrix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Victrix. Show all posts

Saturday, April 2, 2022

Beginnings

 Hi all,

Been a busy month or so.  Work has accellerated into its usual end of term crescendo, and I am knee deep in papers to mark.  Another trip round the sun has been marked for both me and the blog, and despite it all, I've managed to get at least a bit of painting done - some more French HYW, a few vikings, and some assorted odds and sods.

IMG_6165
Including these lads.  Seeing a few spots to touch up in the pics.

Birthday loot included some books (on Antigonus, the Hastenbeck campaign, and Isabella of France) possibly to be reviewed later), a box of HYW english to go up against the French, and . . .  drumroll please .  .  . a bag of Victrix successor cavalry.  Turns out a localish store (Lantzalot games, check them out if you're around the South Shore of nova Scotia) is now carrying most of the Victrix line.  This is exceedingly dangerous, in that I pass by the store (they're just off the highway) on  an almost weekly basis when I go to pick up the Cub from his mom's.  


IMG_6167
Rear view.  Pics I got were so-so, but this one turned out okay.

As some of you are no doubt aware, I used to have a successor list in 15mm for Impetus, but have been toying with the idea of doing it in 28mm for a long time.  Antigonus is my boy for the Diadochi, and the fun part of successor lists is that they readily morph - get your core of heavy cav and phalanx, and then Bob's your uncle, depending on what supporting elements you want to bring.


IMG_6160
Chuffed with the banner.  Freehand, and totally stolen from Dean at WAB corner

I very nearly pulled the trigger on this a ways back, but opted for Carthaginians, instead.  While some progress has been made on the latter, it didn't grab me the way I expected, and after the first burst of effort, I've done nothing on them.  Probably should have gone with my gut, and just opted for Successors then.  As it is, I picked up the bag of figs last Friday, and have knocked out the first 6 Xystophoroi models in a week.

IMG_6161
Only put the cloak on the officer.  Saving them for Lykian conversions.

The Victrix kit is fantastic.  Like most of their sculpts, the figs are on the chunky / heroic side, with well defined detail.  Loads of options - the kit on its own can make companion-style early lancers, later lancers, thessalians, and Hellenistic javelin and shield cavalry.  Mixed with some of their other kits, I imagine the options expand even further, and I'm already thinking about using some bits from here with their persian kits to make Lydian or Carian cavalry.


IMG_6162
Main limitation of the kit is the horses - only 3, and no mix and matching for variety.

The plan is to make this a steady-but slow-grow project.  Maybe pick up a bag a month, start with the core bits, and then branch out.  After some humming and hawing, and consulting of the oracle via the internet, I've opted to start with 120mm unit frontage, in two 6cm square bases.  It's big enough to jam 3 horses on a base, I can pack 2-3 ranks of infantry on there, and they can readily be expanded - either into deeper units, or wider, by adding another base and bumping the width to 180mm.


IMG_6164
The horses themselves are great though, lovely sculpts.

12cm frontage works as a starter size for my most readily available table (6x4), and is compatible with Impetus, Hail Caesar, or To the Strongest, the rules that I'm most likely to play.  The numbers of models I'm able to cram in don't rally work visually for the "mass battle" effect, but this is very much at the "toy solder" end of the project spectrum for me, rather than "wargame", so I'm not too concerned.  If I wanted mass, I'd have gone 6mm.

IMG_6163
These guys will hit like a truck.

I am, needless to say, stoked about this project - to the point that I very nearly broke my own guidelines and bought more yesterday.  Managed to resist, however, and will stick to my planned schedule.  I'm not sure what to do with the other 6 horse (the bag makes 12).   The various sources I've tracked down suggest that at his height, Antigonus would have had access to satrapal and colonist cavalry, and Demetrios (his son, co-king/vice-regent, and most trusted subordinate general), would have had access to lots of allied greek cavalry..  Much of the former would have been "persian" style cavalry, but some from the Ionian coast would have been Lydian / Carian, and closer to the greek type, while the colonists would have been, I think, Macedonian colonists, rather than persian.  I might just opt for the heavy javelin and shield type common in the later successor lists.  

Next up is likely to be some more French, and then possibly vikings, as progress has been made on both fronts.  Until then, take care.

FMB

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Vikings. Also thoughts and plans.

 Hi all,

Been a busy month or so in Monkeyland.  End of term, the onset of winter, and escalating plague numbers have meant that while some hobby's been accomplished, probably less than I'd hoped, and there's been little motivation for blogging.  That said, my grades are in, I've made at least a start on Christmas baking, and I've had a chance to take some pics and think about the coming season.

IMG_5932
First of the Victrix vikings.  Good variety of poses, great variety of heads and arms.

I have it on reliable authority that Santa will be bringing me the makings of a 100 Years War French force, by way of a box of Perry Agincourt French Infantry, and Mounted Cavalry.  This will likely be my new project for the new year, and I'm fairly stoked.  I'm fond of the period (via the usual books and movies), and am keen to do up some French (which seem woefully under-represented on the table; everyone does the English, can't imaging why?).


IMG_5931
Little dark, my apologies.  Sculpting is clean, nice details, not a lot of flash or lines.

Prospects of a new project have me going through the usual mental gymnastics of thinking about rules and basing.  There was an interesting podcast from the Plastic Crack boys the other day, where in the process of discuss "ancients" (which also seemed to include medievals), they made the point that rules preferences are very much driven by a couple factors; the kind of game you like, and the kind of game you can get local players to play with you.  While that's a bit of a truism, it hit home pretty hard for me, and I think solidified some of my thinking on the project.


IMG_5933
Loving the Santa hat head.  Definitely going to play with the set to make a proper Santa.

Anyone who's followed my meanderings over the last several years (we're in year twelve, for those counting), knows that I've played around with ideas for a "big" ancients project for a while.  I picked up some Victrix carthaginians a while back, eyeball their successors line on a regular basis, and have repeatedly made plans for huge, sprawling projects in a range of scales.  But they never seem to get off the ground.


IMG_5934
Decent mix of armoured and unarmoured bods.  I made a mess of regular dudes with helm, shield, and either axe or spear.  Saved the swords for hearthguard types.

The problem is, I think, that those huge games require years of dedication to pull off.  I'm a hobby magpie, usually have multiple projects on the go, and even when I do manage to amass a large collection of something, struggle to find opponents with comparable collections, and time and space for a massive game.  Case in point, the Cub and I are planning a BIG 40k game for the holidays, but realistically, this is a once, maybe twice a year undertaking, and the armies involved have taken more than 5 years to amass.  The thing is, however, that I've been able to play with them along the way.  This is less possible with a lot of the historical armies I'm interested in.  Small unit pike actions just don't make a lot of sense, and if I'm doing Carthage or Antigonids, I'm aiming for big battles anyways.


IMG_5935
Also gave the elites the bigger shields.  Some really dynamic poses with these guys.

With medievals, however, there's a sweet spot.  The same troops show up in small actions as big battles, and so collections can be gamed as they grow.  I've noticed this with my vikings (which I've been picking away in in between other projects), and think it will also apply to the French.  When I start them, I don't need to aim for anything huge.  Two or three dozen foot, and a dozen or so  mounted figures, are enough for a game of Lion Rampant, and I can add units as I go.  Moreover, even if I can't find someone with another medieval force, painting up opposition isn't that hard, because of the numbers involved.  This has worked out pretty well with the ECW stuff I've been messing with for the last year or so, and I think is the way to do for me in the future.


IMG_5936
Kept the mail dark, but might break down and brighten it.

The big question that remains, is the perennial one of basing.  When I did the ECW stuff, I went with square, Warlord style basing, with the assumption that it would be compatible with Pikeman's Lament, but suitable for larger games in the future.  I think with the 100 Years War project, I'll invert that logic; I'll base for Lion Rampant, and deal with "big battle" compatibility if and when that possibility arises.

IMG_5937
Berzerkers mandatory.  For Khorne! . . . oops, wrong game.

There was a fellow on the Lion Rampant Facebook page who recently posted his War of the Roses stuff, based on rounds, in a style inspired by Dalauppror.  Infantry based 1, 2, or 3 to a base, and cavalry generally 1 or 2.  It looked really good, and I think works for medievals in a way it might not for more coherently linear periods.  Cavalry on rounds is something I'm used to from Lord of the Rings, and always thought it looked well.  I'm going to try the "multi-figure on rounds" basing for the next batch of vikings I put together, and see how I like it, but I think it'll be the way to go.

IMG_5938
Probably should add a little more depth of color to the furs.

There's been some other stuff finished up, both historical and fantasy/sf, and no doubt I'll be able to claw out some time to get caught up on posting.  Hopefully, the plague won't cancel Christmas, as I'm really looking forward to it.  We won't have the Cub Christmas day (he's at his mom's), but he's supposed to join us Boxing day (aka St. Stephen's), and Puddin' will thus have Christmas morning to herself.  I'm staring down a week of power baking, and then hopefully a few days to relax.  If I do this right, I'll have enough leftovers that I can simple point the hungry towards the fridge for several days following . . . .

FMB